In this solo analysis episode, Dr. Anthony Chaffee provides a detailed rebuttal to points made by the vegan team in a recent carnivore versus vegan debate. He systematically addresses claims about cardiovascular disease prevention, cholesterol's role in health, and dietary biomarkers. Dr. Anthony Chaffee challenges the fundamental assumption that LDL cholesterol causes heart disease, citing recent meta-analyses from 2021 showing saturated fat is protective against stroke and cardiovascular disease.

The episode reveals how the sugar industry paid Harvard professors in the 1960s to falsify data blaming cholesterol instead of sugar for heart disease, fundamentally changing dietary guidelines worldwide. Dr. Anthony Chaffee explains that when Americans reduced cholesterol intake by 30% and red meat by 33% while increasing fruits and vegetables, obesity, heart disease, and diabetes rates all tripled. He also addresses environmental sustainability claims, demonstrating how regenerative grazing with livestock actually restores soil health and prevents desertification, contrary to crop agriculture which has caused massive topsoil loss.

Key Takeaways

  • LDL cholesterol does not cause heart disease according to 2021 meta-analyses published in major cardiology journals, with saturated fat showing protective effects against stroke
  • The sugar industry paid three Harvard professors in the 1960s to publish fraudulent studies blaming cholesterol for heart disease when evidence pointed to sugar as the culprit
  • When Americans reduced cholesterol intake by 30% and red meat by 33% starting in 1965, obesity rates tripled, heart disease tripled, and diabetes rates increased exponentially
  • TMAO studies showing harm from meat consumption used mixed diets with processed foods and did not study pure carnivore populations, creating confounding variables
  • Regenerative grazing with livestock restores desert ecosystems and prevents the 27.5 billion tons of topsoil loss that occurs annually from crop agriculture
  • Vegan diets are undefined nutritionally since 'vegan' only means 'no meat' - a diet of Oreo cookies and alcohol is technically vegan but clearly unhealthy
  • Debate Rebuttal Introduction - Carnivore vs Vegan Evidence Standards
  • Carnivore Diet Studies and Indigenous Population Evidence
  • Blue Zones Myth and Cholesterol-Heart Disease Connection Debunked
  • Epidemiological Studies Problems and Authority Appeals
  • LDL Cholesterol Research - Statins and Cardiovascular Risk
  • TMAO Studies and Carnivore vs Meat-Eater Distinctions
  • Weight Loss Claims and Diabetes Treatment Comparisons
  • Environmental Sustainability - Agriculture vs Regenerative Grazing

This is an auto-generated transcript from YouTube and may contain errors or inaccuracies.

okay hey guys uh this is dr chafee um just wanted 
to do a quick uh video just just going over some   of the points that was made in the recent 
carnival versus vegan debate that was held by   uh acton and just do a bit of a rebuttal 
on some of the points that the vegan team   made um just because we didn't have a bit 
as much of a back and forth um during the   the debate itself so i just wanted to address 
some of the points that they had as well or sort   of go through them live and then sort of you 
know stop and start and uh talk about things   as we go okay uh i also just want to say you know 
i had a really nice time with this time you know   everybody involved you know you know whether or 
not we agree or disagree everyone you know was   coming from a very honest place you know they 
they you know my impression was that everybody   you know truly wanted uh what was right for people 
they wanted to sort of figure out the truth and   and what was the best way to help people and i 
think that's the best way of doing things and   i think it's very important for uh like-minded 
people in that in that regard uh to come together   and have these sorts of discussions and i think 
that it went uh very well from that standpoint   and uh everything was very uh you know collegial 
which is which is the way to do it and you have to   have these sorts of discussions and debates so 
that you know your people hash out their ideas   and and bounce them off other people that have an 
opposing view and and see what comes up so uh i   think that that went well from that standpoint i 
just wanted to to go through uh some of those so   we'll start here with uh uh first uh 
gentlemen who's an amazing guest here we go uh good evening everyone and thank you for joining 
and thank you pran for opening up opening up the   debate i want to start off to think about why 
we choose a dietary pattern we either choose   it to live longer or to prevent disease and 
pran gave some very interesting arguments but   nowhere did i hear about any thing about the 
carnivore diet preventing the most common   diseases of western society or prolonging life 
the major disease is now it's a quick one on that   so obviously there there aren't you know robust 
studies that have have specifically exclusively   looked at the carnivore diet and you know what 
that's going to do long term these are these are   starting to come out now harvard just published 
a study um there was another study that just came   out you know just a couple days ago as well and 
this is going to sort of get the ball rolling   on those sorts of things hopefully we will get 
that sort of thing the the point that people in   the meat is good or carnivore camp uh are coming 
for or are making is that you know there is there   is data and there's information that you know it 
is very clear that the the thoughts and and um uh   you know notions that we've had for for decades 
now are actually not true and so you know when you   have a you know sort of you know something based 
on a false pretense predicated on information we   now know as false we have new information that 
that shows that it's not that it's not accurate   you have to sort of throw those those assumptions 
out and you have to start over again okay and   that's and that's a lot of what these arguments 
are from they're quite robust actually so you   know just not having you know a specific size 
oh where's your rct that shows exactly what   carnivore does well they're coming but there's 
there's evidence that exists outside of that   and a big part of that evidence is showing that 
your evidence uh isn't actually accurate okay   now society relate to cardiovascular disease 
cardiometabolic disease and cancer and vegan and   mostly plant-based diets are the only dietary 
patterns that are able to achieve these goals   when will you think about choosing 
a dietary pattern for our health   just a quick one there again 
you know i addressed this in   you know my my part of the debate and i went 
further on my my larger discussion on my arguments   what what is a vegan diet vegan just means not 
meat so the only thing that makes a vegan diet is   not meat so you know any vegan diet so just eat 
oreo cookies and shoot heroin that that's okay   that's going to reduce your cancer rate that's 
going to be better than eating a steak really   you know probably not so you know when when 
you're talking about vegan diet like what does   that even mean you know generally when people go 
vegan they're being very health conscious they're   thinking about this they're not eating processed 
foods they're not going out to meals they're   not eating drinking sodas they're not eating 
things with a bunch of added sugar and so forth   you're cutting out a lot of things that 
that actually cause harm we know cause harm   and so of course you're going to get better if you 
were eating those things before and so you know   that's not a that's not a controlled experiment 
a controlled experience means you change one   variable and you look at this group that hasn't 
changed anything you change one variable and then   you look at this group that's what a controlled 
uh trial looks at that's not what's going on here   with the vegan community they're not just changing 
one thing they're changing dozens of things   and then they're saying oh wow you know but 
because we call it vegan vegan means no meat   that's what it is well no i'm sorry you know if 
you if you stop eating meat and you just eat a   bunch of oreo cookies and you're drinking alcohol 
and smoking cigarettes all plant-based you are   not going to be doing well i'm sorry so they're 
doing a lot of other things the people that have   benefits are doing a lot of other things because a 
lot of people don't a lot of people do eat a bunch   of crap because they think that well it's vegan 
therefore is good for me no of course it's not health and well-being we have to think about 
outcome benefits the first thing we do is   do is do no harm and i have seen plenty of 
harm done by people eating a predominantly   carnivore diet especially with underlying 
underlying heart disease and then we have to   think about choosing a dietary pattern that is 
evidence for outcomes and reduced disease race   when we recommend this for our patients and 
ourselves and for the people around us this is   what we need to look for and the evidence needs to 
be consistent for the food patterns and individual   foods within that particular particular patterns 
and that can only be said for for a vegan diet   as a preventative cardiologist 
i've been on a 10 year journey   to recommend sustainable dietary pattern that 
allow patients to have a reduced disease rate and   reduce reliance on medications to treat cardiac 
cardiovascular disease and it's no surprise to   see that the ex-president of the american college 
of cardiology kim williams after his first heart   attack decided to become vegan you know and also 
other wonderful preventative cardiologists such as   robert vogel team doctor to the nfl and 
and dean ornish throughout this debate   i would urge you okay so that's appealing 
to authority first of all just because some   some expert or something somewhere says this is 
the right way to go doesn't actually mean that it   is hitler was an expert hitler was an authority 
do we just do everything that he said because   you know he's an authority no of course not you 
know that's nice that you know people are are   going this that they feel that they're an expert 
and they feel that that's the right thing for them   to do but it doesn't actually prove anything you 
know um and again what vegan diet what vegan diet   is he talking about does he just say yeah just 
eat oreo cookies and you know you know and a   bunch of pasta and drink soda that's all vegan you 
know oreo cookies are vegan okay so you know i'm   positive that he is not having people do that when 
they go onto a vegan diet and i'm sure he doesn't   recommend that either so there's this conflation 
where you're saying you go on to a vegan diet and   everything gets better and i'm sure he's having 
you know very good results you know and and he's   obviously someone who cares about his patients and 
obviously someone who's trying to do the best for   them and i'm sure that the diets and things like 
that that he's putting forward are helping them   where are they starting where are they ending up 
they're probably eating a whole bunch processed   crap with a bunch of sugar and carbohydrates and 
other nonsense and then he's getting him off all   of that crap and put him on like a whole food 
vegan sort of plant-based whatever and at the   same time he's saying oh and reduce the amount 
of fat and you know saturated fat animal fat and   animal products that you have you know but 
he's going to be changing a lot of things   as well okay and you know we have we have so 
much evidence to show that that cholesterol   doesn't actually cause heart disease that's not 
the problem here this is an inflammatory process   and you know actually has to do with you know 
um you know hyperglycemia and you know um   different kinds of cholesterol molecules like 
vldl and hdl or sorry vldl and sdldl that are   derived from fructose and alcohol not from meat 
and that these then get glycated from the high   blood sugar and that your your body can't suck 
these things up anymore because it's just damaged   now that's what glycation is is what kills 
diabetics having that high blood sugar   and so now your body can't suck these things 
up you get by your liver can't you process   them the only things that can pick these up are 
the scavenger receptors on your macrophages and   so your macrophages start picking these things 
up they just eat them up eat them up eat them   up beat them up and up and they grow and grow 
and grow they turn these massive foam cells and   during this whole inflammatory process you start 
getting these these atherosclerotic plaques okay   that's been well described in the literature okay 
so it's not cholesterol it's this entire disease   process that is generally you know pushed and 
predicated on eating sugar eating carbohydrates   drinking alcohol okay smoking cigarettes oh 
there's a ton of things that that add to this   you know but just eating cholesterol is 
really not not the driving factor here   the carnival team to produce any long-term 
studies to show that a carnivore diet produces   a reduction in cut in in event rates or 
reduction in reduction in cancer again   you know we don't have those studies that show 
specifically a carnivore diet is going to do this   we've got a ton of evidence and studies showing 
that like ketogenic does it we have a ton of   evidence biochemical evidence showing that if you 
cut out carbohydrates this shrinks cancers that   this actually reduces your risk of cancers and 
so forth by certain specific biochemical pathways   that that get disrupted when you eat carbohydrates 
okay at a cellular at a microcellular level okay   um you know so that's a that's a false argument 
you know it's like of course we're not going to   produce a lot you know 30-year long carnivore 
study showing that they don't exist yet because   this is a very new burgeoning argument that's 
actually very very old but it's just being   rediscovered now um and so we of course we don't 
have the data for that you know but we do have   data looking at indigenous people like the inuits 
and so forth or the native australians where they   don't they weren't eating any you know plant-based 
products at all they're eating very high fat diets   they weren't getting any of these problems and 
they'll they'll argue there's like oh well there's   these studies that actually show that you know 
the indians and so forth uh living i mean wherever   i actually have you know mixed sort of you know 
some have heart disease some have atherosclerosis   some don't some have diabetes actually you 
know you can't just say that those studies   look at the inuit people as an ethnic population 
not living in their natural state as carnivores   as high-fat carnivores they're talking 
so they're including the people living   in cities eating a western diet well we all know 
that's going to be that's going to be a problem   we're trying we're not talking about the ethnic 
group inuits we're talking about their traditional   diet and what does that do and that actually 
shows a significant benefit of in health and   reduction in disease um you know i learned when 
i was a kid that you know native americans when   eating a western diet were four times as likely 
to get obesity heart disease diabetes cancer and   so forth right i remember thinking as a kid 
well you know doesn't that mean that the food   is causing the disease because if they don't eat 
the food they don't get the disease and we eat the   food and we get the disease we just get it at 
a lower rate you know and i was thinking okay   well what what is a non-western diet you know what 
would they normally be eating that they're not   now and you know what are they eating that 
we're not vice versa right they never really   said anything but what you know but the answer to 
that is they were they were high-fat carnivores   you know planes indians were eating buffalo 
they drive a herd off off a cliff they have   they have really fatty meat make pemmican look it 
up it's cool with that it's actually really good   they would eat that the rest of the damn year 
okay you have the inuits up north they they're   you know eating seal and and walrus and and uh you 
know bear and things like that polar bear fish and   so forth so you know then when they go onto a 
western diet and you'll drink alcohol and eat   sugar and things like that as well they get very 
very sick okay but then if you stop eating that it   goes away okay so that that's showing causation 
there and there's a study in australia that   actually showed that as well because they you know 
they're very very you know unhealthy population   you know as a whole here in australia the native 
australians uh that's because they're eating you   know western food and they're you know drinking 
alcohol eating sugar and all these sorts of things   and then someone figured out was like okay 
well you know if you you guys won't normally   eat this stuff you know why don't you just 
go back to eat what you normally do which is   meat you know just animals that you you are 
able to hunt in the in the wild and then when   you got them on that it just it just reversed 
everything okay so this is showing causation   okay and there's actual studies that do show 
causation with like fructose and metabolic disease   and all these other sorts of things as well so 
again you don't have that perfectly designed you   know 30-year rct with you know carnivore versus 
whatever but there's other things that exist you   know there's a you know where's the randomized 
control trial showing that parachutes work   where's the randomized control trial showing 
that smoking causes cancer or you know after   or you know atherosclerosis or emphysema you know 
this is something we we just take for granted this   is what we're taught this is what we teach 
and this is what we see but there aren't   any randomized control trials showing that 
okay so again you know there's evidence that   exists outside of a randomized control trial 
but there are carnivore studies coming as well and i might even try to convince you to think 
that all the top researchers from the top   epidemiologists and every top doctor treating 
cardio cardiovascular disease and oncology would   be thinking that they've got it wrong they've got 
it right i want to bring you the evidence based   okay so here's sort of obviously you're gonna 
have to stop a lot here because there's just   a lot of these things are just um i think 
that they're not really robust arguments   so again you know it's just like you know how dare 
you question all the top epidemiologists in the   world well first of all epidemiological 
data um is used to to back things up   they don't have any business doing that when 
you're looking at epidemiological studies   generally if it doesn't show a 200 
percent you know increased correlation   you don't even look at it as significant all these 
epidemiological studies are showing like an 18   increase and so forth they have so many 
confounding factors that go into these sorts   of things and in fact when they redid all these 
epidemiological studies they didn't even show a   correlation between you know eating meat and bowel 
cancer eating meat and heart disease eating meat   and all these sorts of things okay so um you know 
and and again that's appealing to authority just   because you know teachers said so that doesn't 
actually mean it's true you know all the top   scientists in the world thought the earth was flat 
too at one point how'd that one work out okay and   if you really want to know what the top the top 
epidemiologist on earth thinks professor john i   neides from stanford who is one of the top 10 most 
cited researchers of all time in any field he said   and i quote that eat lancet study is not 
science it's science fiction and that's   the only way i can describe it or paraphrase 
them anyway so actually the top epidemiologists   think this is garbage and they've shown 
scarves you look up his work he talks about it observational studies when we think about some of 
the work done in the blue zones by dan buettner   from ikaria loma linda sardinia um 
okinawa and nikoi and costa rica   these diets of the world's longest living people 
are predominantly plant-based they did not either   they did not eat a lot of red meat and i can 
guarantee you they weren't in ketosis for the   for their whole lives yet these are the people 
living living to 90th 90 years old and longer   and are happy and alive so when you think about 
okay again so these are very problematic studies   the blues blue zone study they only looked 
at incomplete data they didn't look at every   single society they didn't look at native 
populations they were eating as a carnivore   okay they just skipped those out all right um and 
you know talking about okinawa okay uh okinawa   they're saying that all these people these things 
didn't eat red meat that's that's clever how he   used that word didn't use red meat they eat a 
lot of pig they eat they have pigs all over that   island okay they eat a lot of meat okay it's just 
pig it's not red meat like oh sorry you know i   guess throw the whole whole argument out um and uh 
actually uh the longest-lived city is um hong kong   uh and this again is averages from birth right 
which is mostly meaningless but that's what   we're looking at uh that's how we compare these 
things so hong kong eats the most meat per capita   of any population in the world they have 
the longest average lifespan from birth okay   conveniently things like the blue 
zone study and eat lancet and all that   just just ignore that okay or just leave it out 
all right um and then okay these guys are living   to the 90s well they're not all living to their 
90s again their average is you know i think it's   uh 78 in okinawa around there i think um hong kong 
is around 80. anyway it but that's the highest   um so you know that's the average people are 
living older than that though but they're saying   they're living to their 90s okay great um we 
know as geneticists that the human animal is   chromosomally genetically designed to live 120 
years okay so 90 is dying young actually okay so   you're doing something wrong okay now maybe it's 
because you're eating plants you're not eating   whatever it is you're doing something and again 
okinawa eat a lot of meat they eat a lot of pig   okay um so you know that's not you know that's not 
really you know uh a fair assessment i don't think   uh you know these people you know they're 
living longer as having a plant-based diet   i then want to ask you to think about 
a biomarker and biomarkers we use which   doesn't necessarily change our mortality but 
they are clues and a plant-based diet is the only   and vegan diet is the only dietary pattern that 
consistently reduces and improves biomarkers   associated with major disease 
states we do know that a   plant-based diet reduces traditional risk 
factors such as high-sensitivity crpl ldlc and high in whole grains um nuts and seeds 
leads a reduction in ldl blood pressure and also   lipoprotein delay even with as much as four weeks 
we can on a vegan diet we can see a reduction in c   and crp lp little a as powerful as taking as 
powerful as taking statin medications then when   we think okay so let's talk about that okay so 
uh you know he's talking he's talking about um   you know reduction of ldl cholesterol ldlc's 
ldl cholesterol um ldl cholesterol does not   cause heart disease okay all the big studies post 
2015 have showed this conclusively okay there's a   meta-analysis so you have a you know control 
trials randomized control trials you have a   meta-analysis which looks at all those randomized 
control trials looks all the data and sort of   correlates it out statistically and said okay what 
are we seeing here with this massive population   and these these you know massive group of people 
now the large meta-analysis um in the journal of   american college of cardiology published in 2021 
so it's a recent study okay meta-analysis showed   that saturated fat was not a cardiovascular risk 
and instead it was protective against stroke okay   so this goes against everything that we are have 
been taught in medical school certainly that he   was taught during his uh you know residency in in 
cardiology so you know it's understandable that   he's very much on the side of you know cholesterol 
is bad because we've been railing against   cholesterol for 60 years okay it just happens to 
be wrong um more so the british journal of sports   medicine uh they published a paper in the last few 
years showing that saturated fat ldl cholesterol   is not a cause of heart disease um it's actually 
an inflammatory process like i mentioned before   um and in fact there's an inverse relationship 
uh between saturated fat intake and heart disease   inverse okay so it protects against heart disease 
it also protects against alzheimer's and and   parkinson's and so forth because your brain is 
made out of fat and cholesterol and so forth you   need that to keep your brain healthy okay you need 
to to to develop healthy as well so kids vitally   important for them to get this evil saturated fat 
as well okay um there's a large study uh with 60   000 patients i think was published in 2015 looking 
at stats you say oh this is better than stats at   reducing cholesterol we don't want to reduce 
cholesterol cholesterol is not the problem okay   statins have side effects okay they sap your cells 
of vitamin co q10 anybody who prescribes statins   you know without prescribing vitamin 
c q10 i think is doing their patient a   big disservice okay because i can actually damage 
your your cells and damage your heart cells okay   so you're giving a medication to protect your 
heart and you're you're now damaging your heart   with that medication okay that's not great so 
this looked at patients over the age of 65 is the   most common cohort for people they're at risk of 
heart disease and and um and heart attack zero   on statins sixty thousand people they found that 
there was a that that taking statins was at least   neutral in their um in their risk of getting 
a heart attack and stroke and so forth or even   worse okay so people are having statins having you 
know lower ldl cholesterol we're actually having   worse outcomes okay so statistically was actually 
wasn't quite even it was actually they were a   little worse okay so saying look we really need 
to rethink this because we're giving a medication   that that is is not helping it is definitely 
not helping and it could be causing harm and   i would argue that it does cause harm 
because you're giving somebody something   that has side effects and no benefit okay so 
that's the definition of causing harm okay   the british uh you know uh the bmj the british 
medical journal um they did a literature review   a few years ago as well again found no association 
are actually in inverse association between   ldl cholesterol and all cause mortality and 
cardiovascular mortality in the elderly okay so   what are we doing that's not a marker of disease 
there was another study another lit review in 2018   um that showed again ldl cholesterol does not 
cause cardiovascular disease there's another   study showing that lower cholesterol level 
levels were linked to depression and suicide   okay so people that had lower ldl cholesterol 
were having much higher rates of depression and   the ones who had depression and low cholesterol 
had a much higher rate of suicide okay that's   a big deal all right so in fact now psychiatrists 
who know this are now recommending their patients   get your damn cholesterol up okay that's good is 
going to save your life and change your life okay   um so you know this is all the new data this 
is this is very robust stuff we're talking   about hundreds of thousands of patients we're 
talking about massive studies meta-analyses all   these sorts of things okay but we almost don't 
need them okay because all the studies that   showed that cholesterol caused heart disease were 
bunk there is no high level evidence that actually   shows that cholesterol is even associated 
with heart disease no high level evidence   none and the evidence that we do have we now 
know is bunk we now know it's not only false   but fraudulent okay the journal of american 
medical association published in 2015 actual   internal memos from the sugar companies back 
in you know you know 40s 50s 60s talking about   how there were studies coming out that that were 
suggesting that sugar caused heart disease now we   you have actual hard evidence to suggest that it 
does okay so at the time they were like okay well   you know we need to put some you know counter 
arguments out there so in their own words in   their own documents they detailed how they paid 
off three harvard professors to falsify data and   publish fraudulent studies to make it appear as 
if cholesterol was causing heart disease when it   was really sugar and one of those professors was 
named head of the usda in 1965 and then the usda   is the was the one that declared unequivocally 
that cholesterol causes heart disease saturated   fat increases cholesterol stop eating both it 
changed the world people stopped eating fat they   stopped eating cholesterol i stopped eating red 
meat especially and eggs because all these are   the worst they have the most cholesterol actually 
they're the best they have the most nutrients that   which cholesterol is one of and so a saturated 
fat what were the results you know we reduced our   our cholesterol intake by 30 reduced red meat 
by 33 percent increased fruits and vegetables   by 30 and 40 respectively increase you know 
sugars and grains as well what happened this is   in america hundreds of millions of people what 
happened the obesity rate tripled stroke crate   tripled heart disease tripled cancer rates tripled 
type 2 diabetes autoimmune disorders alzheimer's   parkinson's even neurodevelopmental delays such 
as autism these all increased exponentially   okay these almost didn't exist before now 
they're the only things we treat so you know   he's talking about well where's your where's your 
evidence to say that a carnivore diet is going to   reduce these things dude where's yours you know 
the you know you we reduced cholesterol by 30 we   reduce saturate you know saturated fat and and 
red meat by 30 33 okay heart disease went up   heart disease tripled okay so that is that is 
very conclusive right well maybe there's something   else going on obviously there's a lot of these 
things can go on but when you run an experiment   especially with hundreds of millions of people 
and you get these outcomes you have to start   thinking about it okay as richard feynman said you 
know it doesn't matter how brilliant your theory   is and it doesn't matter how smart you are if it 
doesn't agree with experiment it's wrong okay so   we did the experiment it's wrong okay and we know 
that we have we have hard evidence showing that   it's [ __ ] okay ansel keys did something called 
the seven you know seven nation study or something   like that and he found the nations that say oh the 
more cholesterol you have the more heart disease   you have it was it was this exponential growth was 
exponential you know chart okay wow that was very   that was very compelling but that's a correlation 
correlation does not equal causation okay   and he had complete data for like 23 countries 
he only used the seven that fit the graph if you   look at the rest of the of the of the countries 
if you plot those on a graph it's just scattered   you know so there isn't even a correlation   okay there isn't a correlation let alone a 
causation okay so there is no correlation between   cholesterol and heart disease framingham study 
okay there's a very famous study in cardiology   i think it's like 76 000 patients followed 
them for like 20 years and they're like okay   what sort of markers these biomarkers that he's 
talking about which ones are significant and they   concluded that cholesterol total cholesterol is 
before we distinguish them total cholesterol being   higher was an increased risk for heart disease and 
cardiovascular disease okay the only problem with   that is their own results and findings showed 
the opposite okay but they actually you know   and you can find this and they says like well you 
know we did find this and this that and the other   however we still feel that you know cholesterol 
is is a significant uh risk factor okay that's   fraud that that is your academic malpractice 
okay but that went out and you get these things   and you repeat them so many times that people 
just oh well that's what it is everyone knows   it well again everyone knew that the earth 
was flat too not that one worked out right   oh and the seeds too i mean okay you who cares 
if you're we don't care that we're reducing ldl   cholesterol but you know it does one thing though 
let's say that you wanted it to do reduce the ldl   cholesterol okay but you got to understand this 
is a complex you know organic count you know these   are all complex organic compounds you're putting 
in your body and there's tens of thousands of them   you know what do those ones do what do the 
rest of them do okay because i mean there's   cyanide in almonds okay you know one to two 
pounds of almonds in a day will kill you   okay you know inside a peach pit it looks like a 
little shriveled up almond it's called call the um   um what is it called bitter almond okay one or two 
of those will kill you with the amount of cyanide   that's in there okay so a seed is a plant's baby 
okay all organisms protect their babies more than   anything a seed is a plant's baby that's generally 
where you'll find the highest concentration of   toxic elements okay so you're eating a bunch of 
seeds to lower your cholesterol which you don't   want to do and you're bringing in all this 
other crap again it's cherry picking okay so   you're saying this you have this one beneficial 
thing okay what else is in there what are the   other hundred thousand things that are so that 
are in in all men what do those ones do for you   okay are they all good or at least neutral so 
there's one good thing just sort of tips you over   the balance you know the answer to that riddle 
is no okay so we'll go on think about more novel   risk factors and my teammate um jason's going to 
talk about the microbiome but i want to talk about   trimethylamine and inoxide which is produced 
by the gut in response to choline consumption   choline comes from red red meat eggs and 
dairy and the more tmao we produce in   our guts as a byproduct of these foods the higher 
the risk for cardiovascular disease kidney disease   obesity and myocardial infarction and what's 
fascinating is if if you vegans do not produce   tmao in the gastrointestory intestinal tracts 
and we this is research has come out of the   cleveland clinic and has been re reproduced in 
multiples multiple studies on both high risk   and low risk risk patient groups then we have 
to start thinking okay that's a better argument   all right you know talking about tmao and so forth 
fine yeah you know i have no problem with that the   problem the problem um comes because these these 
studies look at meat eaters not carnivores okay so   you know he asked us where's the carnivore 
study that shows that a carnivore diet   shows improvement in these sorts of things okay 
where's your study that shows a carnivore diet   causes harm because we don't have those studies 
either okay we look at meat eaters we look at   people that have meat in their diet okay and this 
is again problematic with these epidemiological   studies and these confounding factors because 
you know we've been told for the last you   know 40 50 years that eating meat will kill you 
especially red meat will kill you and so you have   you have a certain population who then says you 
know what i'm gonna do this because i enjoy it   and i want to do it so screw it i only have one 
life well a lot of people with that mentality   also smoke drink you know you know do extreme 
sports and all these sorts of things they're more   likely to die in a car a car accident they're more 
likely to speed more likely to do different things   that are that are dangerous because they say screw 
it i've only got one life i'm going to enjoy it   and you know red meat got put into that category 
of something that's super bad for you and they're   like ah screw it so you have these people 
that that is a confounding factor and that   is something has to be accounted for okay 
so when they control for those things   you know that you know meat eaters are more 
likely to smoke they're more likely to drink   the more likely you do all these sorts of things 
when you control for that and you and you sort of   uh correct for that you actually don't find an 
association with any of this crap okay so again   where's the study that shows that carnivorism 
caused about not meat eating with all this   other crap going on but carnivorism and 
okay so and and so for the microbiome   your microbiome is going to be very very different 
depending on what you eat it changes basically   daily okay because your what you eat feeds your 
your gut biome okay and so if you eat different   things you're gonna have a different biome 
okay so it depends on what bacteria you have   you have specific bacteria that will break down 
specific things into specific byproducts okay   so if you have specific bacteria that 
you know may turn you know these these   um you know choline into uh you know a tmao 
okay maybe all right are you gonna have that   gut bacteria if you're on a carnivore diet do 
that study where's your study showing that okay   um probably not honestly i don't know because 
we don't have a study but we don't know   it doesn't matter though because if you're just 
eating a carnivore diet you're not eating fiber   fiber delays the absorption actually blocks and 
stops the absorption and breakdown of the food   that you eat this was the argument there's the 
entire argument in the 80s on why you should eat   fiber because it stops you from absorbing calories 
it has no nutrition it feels like you're full   and it blocks your body's ability to absorb food 
how would that arise in nature that that's like   a good thing for survival and starvation 
i mean that doesn't make any damn sense   but that was the argument when it was all fat 
busters gotta lose weight lose weight lose weight   all these sorts of things um okay but what are 
you doing you're stuck you have these big tangles   of fiber that you cannot break down no vertebrate 
animal can break these down it's actually special   bacteria in the guts of things like you know of 
herbivores that can break this stuff down okay we   don't have those okay there's something you can 
get some of those in your large intestine they   don't exist before that um so you get these big 
tangles okay and you know these food particles   are stuck in these tangles enzymes can't get to 
it and they can't get to the you know the this um   you know the borders of your of your small 
intestine and aluminum your intestine and so   forth so they can't get absorbed okay so these get 
taken into the large intestine where bacteria are   and these then you know cause these problems so if 
you're not eating fiber your body's gonna absorb   all this stuff very little of that is going to 
get if any is going to get you a large intestine   we know this because we've studied this with 
people uh with stomas you know you remove part   of your intestine you have this bag the fecal 
matter comes comes out in the bag and we look at   this when people are not eating fiber and they're 
eating you know animal protein and so forth   almost none of it comes out okay but when you're 
eating plant proteins a lot of it comes out this   is how we know about bioavailability of 
of you know meat-based proteins versus   plant-based proteins okay that's part of you 
know why we know that plant-based proteins   don't have a very high bioavailability and that 
meat does okay so if you're not eating fiber   you know and you're not eating plants at all 
you may not even have the right bacteria that   will turn the stuff into tmao okay but either way 
you're not eating fiber so you know the majority   of what you're eating is going to get absorbed so 
it's not even going to get to the large intestine   to be introduced to the bacteria which may 
not even exist anyway okay so there's that thinking about outcomes because it's fine to 
reduce think about what we see then it's fine   to think about biomarkers but how can we show a 
plant-based diet can reduce both cardiovascular   event rates and and malignancy and these are 
the only dietary pattern that has shown to   reduce uh obesity and we do know 
some people think they can lose a   lot of weight on a ketogenic or or can't 
carnivore diet and perhaps some people do   so you'll have a thinner coffin when you die and 
you'll be if you be this you'll be there sooner   um okay so i mean he literally just contradicted 
himself okay he's saying there's there's   no st there's no diet that you know shows that you 
can get weight loss you accept a vegan diet oh i   mean i guess you could with keto but uh you're 
just gonna die okay well does it make you lose   weight or doesn't it okay and again you know what 
vegan diet what kind of vegan diet are you doing   the oreo cookie cookie and heroin diet that's 
vegan meth is vegan okay just means no meat   right rocks are vegan okay so you 
know you know define your terms here   you know just any old vegan diet no obviously not 
we know that you know but then you're saying oh   nothing else has been shown to do this except for 
vegan diet oh except for all these other things   too but uh you don't want those okay well you know 
you're not really helping your own argument here um we know that vegan diets significantly 
improve improved dyslipidemia we know that   they reduce hypertension we think again who 
gives a [ __ ] about dyslipidemia who cares   about your cholesterol when you're not eating 
sugar you're not eating uh you're not drinking   alcohol and you're not eating a bunch of 
carbohydrates to jack up uh your blood   sugar okay you know if you're if you're one of 
these people that are you know you know drinking   alcohol eating sugar eating carbohydrates 
and so forth you know statin might help you   you know because you you do have you know uh 
you know this disease process this inflammatory   process that's going on okay you know maybe that 
will help that would be an interesting study   if you distinguish out those sorts 
of things okay um but yeah otherwise   i really don't care about cholesterol as a 
doctor and as a patient like i just don't care we think about one of the most common causes of of 
stroke and heart failure in western world it's uh   it's it's hypertension we know that a vegan diet 
predictably you know improves improves diabetes   and and also in also a heart and also 
heart failure okay so one of the most um   one of the the diets that we have the most uh 
data on and conclusive evidence on for helping   diabetes actually is the ketogenic diet we've 
been using that for well over a hundred years   and we using the 1800s to stabilize diabetics 
blood sugar and so forth okay so there is just a   ton of evidence you know showing a ketogenic diet 
if you're diabetic especially type 2 diabetic   type 1 as well you really don't want to eat 
carbohydrates you really don't want to eat sugar   you know so that that is very important for that 
so and again you know oreo cookies not going to be   good for a diabetic hypertension sure hypertension 
is is a killer but you know i i'm you know we have   no study showing that a carnivore diet increases 
your blood pressure none okay and i have   dozens of patients right now on a carnivore diet 
i've spoken to hundreds of people over the past   few thousands really and there's you know people 
in you know carnivore groups and chat group things   like that where we talk about these sorts of 
things you know you know rivera health is a really   good one for that there's different facebook 
groups as well um you know dr baker has has helped   tons of people we're not seeing blood pressure 
be an issue in fact we're seeing people get off   their blood pressure medication my father's had 
you know intractable blood pressure problems for   you know for yonks he doesn't anymore that's very 
stable now you know i've been eating this way for   you know i've always been heavy meat eater and 
i've basically been a pure always basically   been in pure carnivore i eat everything else by 
sufferance but you know for about the last 20   years i was really full on for a solid five years 
and then sort of slipped off was eating little   bits and pieces of things here and there and for 
the last you know five six years absolutely not   anything besides meat salt water okay i don't 
have any blood pressure issues okay and you know   my patients don't have blood pressure issues on a 
carnivore diet either okay and i've never heard of   that i've never heard of someone going carnivore 
and having a blood pressure issue um simple reason   why physiologically humans are carnivores that's 
the kind of animal we are that's how we develop   that's how we evolve so you know you know you go 
to first principles we're not going to have these   disease state processes if you're eating naturally 
you know you know elderly lions don't you know   probably don't have a bunch of blood pressure 
issues if they're just you know still eating   meat okay that's an abnormal pathology that 
comes about when eating the wrong thing there are multiple studies published in literature 
in large peer-reviewed literature especially in   study in journals like the journal of american 
party cardiology journal which shows the more   serving of animal foods you have the greater the 
chance of heart disease with 4.8 million million   person years and one of the most important studies 
is that for every cat when even if we replace a   small amount of animal protein with plant protein 
we can show a significant reduction not only   cardiovascular disease but cancer you know it's 
no point treating everyone with heart disease only   for them to die of many many many years later 
okay again so you get these these associations   you know you know correlation is not causation you 
know and again these these epidemiological studies   are saying that like you know this um you know 
meat eaters what does that mean that does not mean   carnivores that means someone who eats meat 
and also smokes and drinks and drives too fast   okay but i don't know which ones he's quoting 
there they've done tons of these over the decades   but the recent ones corrected and controlled 
for those sorts of things they didn't even find   an association with eating meat and these 
poorer outcomes okay um so you know again   like you know and you know i don't know what 
study he's referring to where you're replacing   some you know animal protein with with you know 
with plant protein and that improves some things   somehow i'd have to take a look at the study and 
have to know what he's talking about there but um   it sounds pretty suspect honestly because 
it doesn't make any damn sense you know   if that's the only thing that you're changing in 
that system and again this is going to be a system   eating you know the sad diet you know standard 
australian diet standard american diet things   like that with a bunch of other crap in it 
okay so it's not the meat that's doing this   show me a single study showing me showing 
that you've controlled for everything else   except for meat and meat is the problem show 
me one study that says that there are none and we do know that people that adopted a 
plant-based diet had significantly reduced reduced   malignancy rates um 30 seconds jason 30 seconds 
30 seconds so i'd like to sum up that a vegan   vegan diet is what is the only dietary pattern 
that in a western society has shown a reduction   in the main in in both the incidents and allows 
us treatment for the major diseases that reflect   western society and is sustainable for us for our 
planet for for our population and for our patients   to follow okay so sustainable for the planet 
that is absolutely incorrect um when you grow   a crop you necessarily have to destroy an entire 
ecosystem you have to just you have to bulldoze   and destroy all the plants kill all the plants 
kill all the animals rip up the ground till it up   and then you know plant your crops okay and crops 
well just any plant in general they take nutrients   they get their nutrients from their soil right 
what puts the the nutrients back in animals so   when you're having an ecosystem you have plants 
and animals living in symbiosis where you know   they each nourish eat and help each other 
okay so you know animals will be eating the   plants and then they'll their their excretions 
and so forth will then replace those nutrients   back into the soil okay and that is what is 
what nourishes that replenishes the nutrients   in the soil okay and that's what keeps plants 
growing again um tons of people have done this um   alan savory who's out in zimbabwe he's been doing 
this for 40 years or something like that taking   large herds of animals moving through deserts 
moving through mines like strip mines and things   like that and actually because those animals are 
there all of a sudden these things are able to   you know regrow the soil re-neutral um you know 
re-nourish the soil and all of a sudden they're   growing just massive massive massive amounts of 
vegetation and so forth forests are coming back   you know then new animals will come back through 
you know and start migrating there and so forth   um it's massive changes um you know dr peter 
ballista was very interesting guy you should   look up his stuff i'll try to put some some 
links to these guys in the in the description   uh but you know he's a phd in forage agronomy i've 
i've spoken to him you know just personally i was   very interested in his work so i emailed him and 
we ended up having a you know discussion over zoom   very interesting guy very bright guy really 
shows the science behind how important animals   are to the environment think about it this way 
during the dust bowl in america during the 1930s   um you know no one could grow anything we 
had dust storms all these sorts of things   everything was horrible we then figured 
and it was running into a desert it's   turning to like the sahara desert right um 
which is man-made by the way look it up and   we figured this out this was actually the farming 
techniques okay um and we realized that you know   this is when you you're tilling the soil you're 
making large rows of this stuff it rains it washes   all the topsoil away wind hits it picks it up 
blows it all away okay so you're losing all these   top soil all this top soil we're able to change 
things around to mitigate that but we still lose   billions of tons a year in 2017 we lost 27.5 
billion tons of topsoil okay that's an area   of the size of kentucky okay which is the 
size of you know a european country okay   so you know that that's a finite resource as well 
you know it takes you know uh 500 years to grow a   centimeter of topsoil okay that is going to run 
out a lot quicker than we realize okay and so   you know that's a big problem and you know where 
do these fertilizers come from for crops they   come from animals they come from livestock okay 
they come from their manure you know they talk   about they talk about you know animals you know 
uh all day if we if we just weren't growing all   this you know like you know corn and things 
like that for you know animal feed and stuff   like that you know we we'd have more than enough 
food and blah blah blah blah blah that's nonsense   the the feed that they give to to animals is 
like hey how much hay do you want to eat exactly   okay they're eating the parts of the plants that 
we cannot eat that we cannot digest 92 percent   of the feed of the the crops grown for um for 
animals for livestock is inedible by humans it's   the leavings it's the waste okay so it's like you 
know the shaft of the wheat and things like that   we can't eat that that's given to cows okay and 
they eat that their manure replenishes the soil   okay so this is nonsense and you know helping 
the like that is just nonsense you know so i   can go to that and other things but watch peter 
ballista watch alan savory you know you he did   uh um several youtube talks and he had a ted talk 
as well quickly about you know the sahara desert   that actually wasn't a desert several thousand 
years ago okay before the agricultural revolution   that's what changed things in my opinion i i think 
that anyway i think the evidence is there you know   the the um the pyramids and and sphinx we had soil 
samples done in the 1990s that actually looked   and found that you know they were like oh these 
always desert people i found no actually these   were these were built in jungles these were jungle 
people these were jungle pyramids okay but they   had widespread farming that sort of grew around 
that time and you know you know in the bc era and   it turned things to desert because they 
didn't figure it out you had the nile river   which flooded every year and the silt would 
replenish the nutrients we learned this as   kids and we don't think past that but what does 
that mean that means that the nutrients needed   to be replenished every single year where all 
the places that didn't have a nile river they   didn't get replenished they couldn't grow 
things after that turned to deserts we have   satellite images infrared satellite images that 
actually showed that there's like human you   know human habitation all across what is now the 
sahara desert you know like you know structures   and things like that you know the the you know 
the bones of a structure and civilizations and   things like that that was not a desert okay these 
things were made by agriculture by crops okay not   animals the animals are what kept these things 
alive okay that's what keeps the environment   and ecosystem alive okay so i think that's 
that's probably enough for that one sorry that   i had a lot to say about that i'll do i'll do 
the other um the other participants as well   because i think there's definitely things 
to address there uh in other videos um this   one was mostly surrounded by um you know with 
the cholesterol debate and i think that that's   something that's very very important because 
that's central to this discussion on plant-based   versus you know meat diets and carnivore vegan 
and and so forth being the extremes of that   but it's something that's very very important 
something i have patients and and you know   friends and colleagues going what about 
cholesterol what about cholesterol what   about cholesterol okay so you look like you're 
in good shape you know you look like you're   healthy and all your bloods and everything 
like that show you're very very very healthy   but what's your cholesterol doing i'll tell 
you what my cholesterol is doing i don't give   a damn i know what my cholesterol is but i don't 
give a damn okay it's actually basically normal   but i don't give a damn if it's high it's 
physiological whatever it is it's physiological   because i'm eating in an evolutionary 
biological species specific way and so whatever   my cholesterol is whatever my bloods are 
doing they're supposed to be doing that you   know we have these blood markers and these these 
studies and these standardized tests that we use   that are predicated on lies okay so we need 
to rethink these and we need to get different   reference ranges and so forth to to tell 
us what's actually healthy and what's not   okay all right guys well i hope you enjoyed that 
i'll be doing further videos uh every week i'll   probably be a little more than that as well 
sometimes i'm starting a podcast as well with   a friend of mine uh simon lewis uh called how 
to carnivore with the plant for emd that's me   no plans um and i'll do more of these uh rebuttal 
sort of videos as well i'm sure they'd like to do   vermont i think that would be great i would 
love to have a conversation with these guys   you know one-on-one maybe even over a video on uh 
on podcasts and because i'm sure they have i mean   things that i said and we said i'm sure they had 
tons of things that they wanted to say about that   and that's how you that's how you work 
this out you both talk back and forth   you say well you said this however i've seen this 
study and looked at this what about this and they   say the same thing back to you and you have a 
discussion and i think that that's a very healthy   thing to do i think that's really the best way to 
to come to you know some sort of conclusion that   you know maybe not maybe you guys you know when 
i'm walking away saying you're going to agree to   disagree but you know other people can take away 
a lot from that and hopefully we can set that up   in the future all right guys if you can like 
and subscribe and share this with people that   would really help i'm just getting the channel 
started and and you know obviously that that is   helpful when you do that so uh click the little 
bell and you'll see more of my stuff thanks guys
Share